(www.91outcomes.com) -- The full House Appropriations Committee met today to markup the FY12 Defense Appropriations bill.
Despite many rumors that the acclaimed Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP) would be eliminated, there were no CDMRP-related amendments during today’s markup. It is certainly possible that all the Hill advocacy by dozens of health organizations over the last several weeks made the difference in preventing that.
However, under the House plan, there would be many changes to the previously successful CDMRP programs. The final FY12 Defense Appropriations Bill as recommended by the Full Committee included the following:
1. Several existing CDMRP programs would not be funded at all: most notably the sort of catch-all Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program; Neurofibromatosis; Pain Management; Global Deployment of the Force medical research; Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine; and SBIR to the core funded RDT&E.
2. Two programs with the most direct military relevance would see 25% increased funding: Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychological Health (increased from $100m to $125m); Orthopedic (from $24m to $30m).
3. Three new programs were created: Hemorrhage Control; Restorative Transplantation; and, a Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program -- totaling $75m.
4. The other 17 programs funded in FY11 would be continued but cut by 20%. Despite the most direct military relevance, these included Spinal Cord Injury, Vision, Gulf War Illness, and Alcohol and Substance Abuse Disorders.
FY11 appropriations first, followed by the FY 12 Full Appropriations Committee Bill Recommended Amounts:
1. ALS $8,000 -- $6,400
2. Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine $4,800 -- -0-
3. Autism Research $6,400 -- $5,100
4. Bone Marrow Failure Disease Research Program $4,000 -- $3,200
5. Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy $4,000 -- $3,200
6. Global HIV/AIDS Prevention $10,000 -- $8,000
7. Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychological Health $100,000 -- $125,000
8. Global Deployment of the Force medical research funding -Department of Defense requested transfer to maintain full funding for the program $125,000 -- -0-
9. Gulf War Illness Peer-Reviewed Research Program $8,000 -- $6,400
10. Multiple Sclerosis $4,800 -- $3,200
11. Peer-Reviewed Alzheimer Research $15,000 -- $12,000
12. Peer-Reviewed Breast Cancer Research Program $150,000 -- $120,000
13. Peer-Reviewed Cancer Research Program $16,000 -- $12,800
14. Peer-Reviewed Lung Cancer Research Program $12,800 -- $10,200
15. Peer-Reviewed Orthopedic Research Program $24,000 -- $30,000
16. Peer-Reviewed Ovarian Cancer Research Program $20,000 -- $16,000
17. Peer Reviewed Vision research in conjunction with the DoD Vision Center of Excellence $4,000 -- $3,200
18. Peer-Reviewed Prostate Cancer Research Program $80,000 -- $64,000
19. Peer-Reviewed Spinal Cord Research Program $12,000 -- $9,600
20. Research in Alcohol and Substance Use Disorders $5,200 -- $4,500
21. SBIR to the core funded RDT&E $1,200 -- -0-
22. Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) $6,400 -- $5,100
23. Pain Management Task Force Research $4,000 -- -0-
24. Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program $50,000 -- -0-
25. Neurofibromatosis Research $16,000 -- -0-
New for FY12:
1. Hemorrhage Control -- $10,000
2. Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program -- $50,000
3. Restorative Transplantation Research Program -- $15,000
**UPDATE from Katie Weyforth Vanlandingham of Van Scoyoc Associates: Neurofibromatosis was funded (located in a different part of the bill than the other programs) and like most of the other CDMRP programs took at 20% cut from FY11. The Peer-reviewed medical research program is usually only funded in the Senate bill (and then ends up in the conference report) because they do not individually fund most of the CDMRP programs in their bill.
--
Anthony Hardie
Madison, Wis.
Hi, I was wondering what source was used for this article. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteSource is the FY12 Defense Appropriations Bill, full Committee draft, p. 259. Bill is at:
ReplyDeletehttp://appropriations.house.gov/UploadedFiles/FY_2012_DEFENSE_FULL_COMMITTEE_REPORT.pdf
I hope these funds are put to good use. That's a lot of money.
ReplyDeleteGreets conservatory suppliers consultant