SOURCE: PRNewswire
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/iom-gulf-war-report-turns-science-on-its-head-researchers-say-568463821.html
ARCHIVED ARTICLE:
WASHINGTON, Feb. 11, 2016
/PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Gulf War Illness is the "signature" health
problem of 1991 Gulf War veterans, affecting an estimated 24-33% of the nearly
700,000 who served, according to a new report of the Institute of Medicine, but
researchers say its recommendations, "turn science on its head."
"The previous IOM
report correctly concluded that the illness is not psychiatric and likely
results from the interplay of genetic and environmental factors," said
James Binns, former chairman of the federal Research Advisory Committee on Gulf
War Veterans' Illnesses. "This report turns that science on its
head."
"This report
recommends stopping research on the health effects of Gulf War exposures and
focusing instead on 'mind-body interconnectedness'," said Gulf War veteran
Anthony Hardie, who chairs a treatment research program funded by Congress.
"It's the same old government theme from the 1990's to deny what happened
and deny care and benefits -- just when research to understand the illness and
identify treatments is finally making real progress."
The report noted two
studies showing an increased risk of brain cancer mortality associated with the
wartime demolition of a vast Iraqi chemical weapons depot at Khamisiyah – one
conducted by the IOM itself – but then concluded this evidence was
"insufficient/inadequate."
"This is a profoundly
sad message for Gulf War veterans with brain cancer and their widows who can't
currently get benefits from VA," said Hardie, who also serves as director
of Veterans for Common Sense.
"IOM committees
should not be made up of former VA officials and their friends," said Rick
Weidman, Executive Director for Policy and Governmental Affairs for Vietnam
Veterans of America. "It's outrageous that the VA Undersecretary from the
1990's who began the policy of minimizing Gulf War Illness was on this
committee, or that the committee chair was on record before she was appointed
saying you can't say what caused it. Half the committee was psychiatric
advocates. It's exactly how the effects of Agent Orange were denied for thirty
years after Vietnam. We intend to seek legislation to prohibit these corrupt
practices."
"The science is
unequivocal, if viewed honestly and in its totality: Toxic exposures were
responsible," said Dr. Beatrice Golomb, Professor of Medicine at the
University of California-San Diego and former scientific director of the
Research Advisory Committee. "But the IOM doesn't look at all relevant
studies. This 'don't look, don't find' practice has been a consistent problem
in IOM Gulf War reports."
"Veterans who were
more exposed to chemicals - particularly pesticides, PB (a nerve agent
pretreatment pill), and perhaps nerve gas -- are more likely to be ill, and to
have more severe illness. Moreover, exposure to related chemicals in civilian
settings has produced similar chronic health problems," said Dr. Golomb.
SOURCE Veterans for Common Sense
###
2 comments:
People ask me why I carry such a bitter disdain for the government propaganda program against Gulf War veterans. I think this article pretty much explains it.
I would like to offer any of those IOM committee members to come and spend just one day with me. If they can spend 24 hours with me and still tell me all the things that I have to deal with are still in my head then I'll concede. However, I am absolutely certain that there isn't a responsible doctor on this planet that would tell me that all I endure is psychological. ("Responsible" would pretty much exclude every doctor at my VA Medical Center. I'd be better served by a bunch of baboons. At least they wouldn't belittle me by telling me that Gulf War Illness doesn't even exist.)
What *is* psychological is my hatred and disgust for individuals and organizations that belittle my disease and dismiss my disability because they either can't or refuse to understand the medical model of Gulf War Illness. Reading this article literally made me nauseous. My psyche is damaged far worse by this sort of unfounded rhetoric than anything from my deployment to Desert Storm.
From where I sit as I write I can see the 21 plus bottles of medications that I take daily, the heating pad that I use regularly, the wrist and knee braces along with compression gloves that I use during flare-ups and a myriad of other things ranging from memory foam neck pillows to lists that help keep my often confused mind in some semblance of order. I look at all these things and I have to ask myself, if this is all in my head, why do I need all these things? Wouldn't the five years of therapy I've gone through cleared things up?
Apparently not.
I can't wish away my physical disabilities and neither should agencies like the IOM.
Peter, hang in there. This sounds so much like what has happened with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis, which has many similar symptoms. Dr Nancy Klimas studies both. I'm sorry for what you're going through and totally understand your anger and mistrust. Take care.
Post a Comment